Haemovigilance survey and screening strategy for arthropod-borne viruses in blood donors from Argentina.

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) count among emerging infections, which represent a major challenge for transfusion safety worldwide. To assess the risk of arboviruses-transmission by transfusion (ATT), we performed a survey to evaluate the potential threat for transfusion safety. Samples were retrospectively and randomly collected from donors who donated during the peak of dengue incidence in Cordoba (years: 2016 and 2019-2022). A cost-efficient strategy for molecular screening was implemented with a nucleic acid test (NAT) configured with Flavivirus and Alphavirus-universal degenerated primers targeting conserved gene regions. Besides, we evaluated the neutralizing antibody (NAb) prevalence by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). A total of 1438 samples were collected. Among the NAT-screened samples, one resulted positive for Flavivirus detection. Subsequent sequencing of the PCR product revealed Saint Louis Encephalitis Virus (SLEV) infection (GeneBank accession number OR236721). NAb prevalence was 2.95% for anti-Dengue, 9.94% anti-SLEV, 1.09% anti-West Nile Virus, and 0% anti-Chikungunya. One of the NAb-positive samples also resulted positive for IgM against SLEV but negative by ARN detection. This is the first haemovigilance study developed in Argentina that evaluates the potential risk of ATT and the first research to determine the prevalence of NAb against Flavivirus through PNRT to avoid possible cross-reactions between Ab against Flavivirus. Herein, the finding of one SLEV-viremic donor and the detection of anti-SLEV IgM in a different donor demonstrated a potential threat for transfusion safety and emphasized the need for increased vigilance and proactive measures to ensure the safety of blood supplies.

Infection by human polyomaviruses JCPyV and BKPyV in blood donors of Argentina.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A spectrum of blood-borne infectious agents may be transmitted through transfusion of blood components from asymptomatic donors. Despite the persistence of polyomaviruses in blood cells, no studies have been conducted in Argentina to assess the risk of transfusion infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated BKPyV and JCPyV in 720 blood donors, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for a region of T antigen common to both viruses. Positive T-antigen samples were subjected to two additional PCR assays targeting the VP1 region. Viral genotypes were characterized by phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: Polyomaviruses were detected in 1.25% (9/720) of the blood samples selected; JCPyV was identified in 0.97% (7/720) and BKPyV in 0.28% (2/720) of them. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the JCPyV sequences clustered with 2A genotype and Ia of BKPyV. CONCLUSION: This study describes for the first time the prevalence of polyomavirus DNA in blood donors of Córdoba, Argentina. The polyomavirus DNAemia in healthy populations suggests that those viruses are present in blood components eligible for transfusion. Therefore, the epidemiological surveillance of polyomavirus in blood banks might be incorporated into haemovigilance programmes, to determine the infectious risk and implement newer interventions to ensure the safety of blood supplies, if required.